What the justices did was disingenuous, to say the least. They have upheld the individual mandate to purchase health insurance -- not because the Constitution gives Congress such power under the Commerce Clause -- but because they view the penalty for NOT complying as merely a "tax."
The linked editorial recalls Justice Kennedy's observation that the mandate “changes the relationship of the Federal Government to the individual in a very fundamental way.” Indeed. By grossly expanding the meaning of the "taxation power," the court has opened the path for Congress to penalize choices they disapprove. It's not too hard to imagine a future point where citizens are "encouraged" to purchase and install windmills or solar panels, and
The last shreds of pretense are falling away. The Supreme Court is more interested in verbal gymnastics than in defending the Constitution, and the rest of the Federal Government has no interest in being bound by that document.
When one party to a contract abrogates it, the other parties eventually realize there's no point in unilateral good faith...
No comments:
Post a Comment