Wednesday, July 21, 2010

There's a name for this...

In any other industry this would be called collusion, and the press would have a field day. But since this case involves journalism, let's just call it what it is: voluntary statist propaganda.

This is yet another example of how marxists project in their accusations. The same chattering class that parroted Hillary's yapping about a 'vast, right-wing conspiracy' in the end actually built such a network themselves.
It was the moment of greatest peril for then-Sen. Barack Obama’s political career. In the heat of the presidential campaign, videos surfaced of Obama’s pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, angrily denouncing whites, the U.S. government and America itself. Obama had once bragged of his closeness to Wright. Now the black nationalist preacher’s rhetoric was threatening to torpedo Obama’s campaign...

Watching this all at home were members of Journolist, a listserv comprised of several hundred liberal journalists, as well as like-minded professors and activists... In one instance, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

Thomas Schaller, a columnist for the Baltimore Sun as well as a political science professor, upped the ante from there. In a post with the subject header, “why don’t we use the power of this list to do something about the debate?” Schaller proposed coordinating a “smart statement expressing disgust” at the questions Gibson and Stephanopoulos had posed to Obama.

“It would create quite a stir, I bet, and be a warning against future behavior of the sort,” Schaller wrote.

Tomasky approved. “YES. A thousand times yes,” he exclaimed.

This is not an example of innocent professional networking. It's an example of message management and communication strategy. That's the role of public relations, not the press.

You now know all you need to about the state of American corporate journalism. Choose your sources of information accordingly...

3 comments:

Conan the Cimmerian said...

Check this out, a good update/addendum for this post:

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/21/liberal-journalists-suggest-government-shut-down-fox-news/

Jemison Thorsby said...

Thanks, "Conan."

I'm not really a fan of Fox or Rush, either (they're more entertainers than serious opponents of the growing power of the State).

Targeting Fox, or "right-wing radio" through the Fairness doctrine is just heavy handed intramural jousting. Liberals and conservatives both have signed up for larger government, just with slightly different priorities. So the food fights are more akin to the Lenin-Trotsky feud over the proper flavor of communism than it is any serious differences in philosophy of governance.

Thanks for stopping by!

Conan the Cimmerian said...

"Liberals and conservatives both have signed up for larger government, just with slightly different priorities. So the food fights are more akin to the Lenin-Trotsky feud over the proper flavor of communism than it is any serious differences in philosophy of governance."

I am in agreement, just thought it was interesting and went along with your original is all.

Site Meter