But if you think that's impressive, try this account:A cataclysmic flood could have filled the Mediterranean Sea — which millions of years ago was a dry basin — like a bathtub in the space of less than two years. A new model suggests that at the flood’s peak water poured from the Atlantic into the Mediterranean basin at a rate one thousand times the flow of the Amazon River, according to calculations published in the Dec. 10 Nature.
“In an instantaneous flash, the dry Mediterranean became a normal Mediterranean like we see it today,” says lead author Daniel Garcia-Castellanos of Spain's Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) in Barcelona.
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights...
For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and as the waters increased they lifted the ark high above the earth. The waters rose and increased greatly on the earth, and the ark floated on the surface of the water. They rose greatly on the earth, and all the high mountains under the entire heavens were covered. The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than twenty feet. Every living thing that moved on the earth perished—birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind.
Everything on dry land that had the breath of life in its nostrils died. Every living thing on the face of the earth was wiped out; men and animals and the creatures that move along the ground and the birds of the air were wiped from the earth. Only Noah was left, and those with him in the ark. The waters flooded the earth for a hundred and fifty days.


2 comments:
I love how the article continually references "millions of years ago"...without giving the notion of a young earth any thought or credence. Maybe...just maybe, things haven't always progressed as they do now, which would change how "geologic" change is viewed and more eyes would open to the truth contained in Genesis.
Exactly right... the physical evidence is static. The interpretation of that evidence, is influenced by whether one assumes uniformitarianism in geologic processes, or the possibility of catastrophism. What amazes me is how popular disaster movies are (Day After Tomorrow, etc), but while folks can envision those fictional tales, they don't stop to think how similar catastrophes (like the Flood) would have reshaped the Earth in unusual ways, rendering uniformitarian interpretations invalid.
Post a Comment