"This was not His doing."The second passage is between the same character... and God Himself:
"But He didn't stop it."
"No, he didn't. He doesn't stop a lot of things that cause Him pain. Your world is severely broken. You demanded your independence, and now you are angry with the one who loved you enough to give it to you. Nothing is as it should be, as Papa desires it to be, and as it will be one day. Right now your world is lost in darkness and chaos, and horrible things happen to those He is especially fond of."
"Then why doesn't He do something about it?"
"He already has..."
"Mack, just because I work incredible good out of unspeakable tragedies doesn't mean I orchestrate the tragedies. Don't ever assume that my using something means I caused it or that I need it to accomplish my purposes. That will only lead you to false notions about me. Grace doesn't depend on suffering to exist, but where there is suffering you will find grace in many facets and colors."As I read the book, I couldn't help but be reminded of Vox's discussions of "omniderigence," and C.S. Lewis' take on the subject of free will and God's Will. Those who prefer an aloof, legalistic and control-freak view of God will not like the tale. But those who can, in the midst of their awe, relax and enjoy God will find that relationship reaffirmed.
"The Shack" has a cover blurb comparing it to Pilgrim's Progress--that may be a bit much. But it was worth the investment of time and thought.


1 comment:
Glad you took the time to read it, and even more that you enjoyed it. Perhaps a bit "unorthodox" but certainly thought provoking! (Sometimes it's refreshing to think "outside the box."
Post a Comment